Thursday, January 31, 2008
Open Source Systems Management: What SysAdmins Want
The following graph shows the results of the poll so far (click on the image to make it bigger).
As interesting and useful as this feedback is (and, btw, thank you for everyone who participated), I think it is equally interesting to read between the lines of this poll's results. The top three features requested, Windows support, and integration plugins to the two most popular open source patching tools, Apt and Yum, speak clearly and unequivocably to the need for better tool integration. As things stand today, there is no open source tool for managing across Linux, UNIX and Windows systems. Further, even in the Linux/UNIX world, Sys Admins must rely on seperate tools for managing configs (Webmin, command or scripts) and patching those systems with something like Yum or Apt. The concept of lifecycle management, where managing configurations and set up is seemlessly linked with patching and provisioning simply does not exist.
If you want all this, you have 2 choices - shell out beacoup bucks for a proprietary system from someone like Opsware (now HP) or BladeLogic, and get about twice the features you actually need and want, or build it (and then maintain it) yourself.
In the next dot release of NetDirector, we are going to go some ways towards helping integrate these various tools. We'll be offering a Windows agent, and we'll be vastly improving the developer docs so that, hopefully, we can convince people on the Yum and Apt projects to help create NetDirector plugins to these tools. Hopefully, we will also be able to include in this release a feature to allow SysAdmins to run their own scripts through NetDirector.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Relieving the systems management burden
read more | digg story
Monday, January 28, 2008
Nokia spends €105m on mobile Linux developer
read more | digg story
Of Open Agents and Wheel Reinvention: The BMC Performance Ma
read more | digg story
The Machine is Us/ing Us (Final Version)
form Dr. Michael Wesch, Kansas State University
read more | digg story
Friday, January 25, 2008
Open Source SysAdmin Tools: Mind the Gap
If you want these features Today, you need to step up to something like Puppet or cfengine. These tools give you all the power, scalability and control you could ever want. What they aren't, though, is easy to use. So, there's this massive gap between the easy-to-use tools on one hand and the scalable tools on the other. And this is where NetDirector plays.
With NetDirector, less-experienced Admins get a GUI for fill-in-the-blanks administration of many of the most popular open source server apps running on one or a group of servers. In the near future, we will enable more experienced admins to create and run their own scripts through NetDirector against a set of distributed nodes. And NetDirector provides tight role-based access control (RBAC) so that, for example, the script functionality can only be accessed by certain Admins, and more junior Admins can only interface with services via the GUI modules.
Why does this matter? It matters, I think, because if you are a mid sized company, you don't want to have different tools for different admins. You want one tool that all admins can use.
And this brings me to the last wicked cool thing about NetDirector. The next dot release, scheduled for mid feb, will include a Windows agent. With Windows support, in addition to filling the gap between single-server tools and massive CM tools, NetDirector will also bridge the fizzure between Linux and Windows tools.
In the interest of full disclosure, what you can do with NetDirector on Windows will be limited initially, since we don't have any plugins for Windows-based applications (yet). But, if for some reason you are running Apache on Windows, you will be able to use NetDirector to manage it. But the key thing is that this sets the foundation for NetDirector really being able to serve as the single, central administration tool for mid-sized enterprises, since just about all of these guys have some Windows. And, it's free and open source (yes, I can use the term open source confidently, since we are also moving to GPLv2 in the Feb. release).
And where we plan to go with NetDirector is very exciting. So, we'll have the script plugin available soon for running scripts against Linux/UNIX servers. And later, we'll implement the ability to run batch scripts through NetDirector on your Windows machines. And how about Windows service plugins, like a SQL Server GUI, an Exchange GUI, etc.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
The Parody Video Tom Cruise WANTS you to see!
read more | digg story
Tom Cruise Maniac Laugh (REMIX)
read more | digg story
Leaked Tom Cruise Interview on Scientology Parody
read more | digg story
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Cisco Networker Barcelona
read more | digg story
The Social Media Press Release - Digital Snippets
read more | digg story
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Sun Buys MySQL, Reaffirming Commitment to Open Source
But I have to say that it's a shame this IR audiocast with Schwartz, Green and Mickos about the deal so royally flunked the Straight-talk test. Where in the hell is Sun's corporate marketing?
I tuned in late, just in time to hear the third from the last questions, which was something like: What does this mean to Sun's relationships with PosgresQL and Oracle?
I plan to listen to the rest once the replay is available and will add to this post as appropriate.
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Berlind dumps ZDNet for CMP
read more | digg story
Friday, January 4, 2008
Is Change the "root of all evil"?
Obviously Bob didn't talk to NetDirector users :-)
But let me ask you - is Change the root of all evil? Or is Uncontrolled Change the root of all evil?
McAfee and Davenport webinar on viability of Enterprise 2.0
read more | digg story
What does Monster.com have against work?
I wonder if you can correlate the rise of online job boards, and Monster's ads like this one, with an increase in job-hopping.
read more | digg story
Thursday, January 3, 2008
Upcoming Event: BarCamp FUDCon 11-13 January 2008
11-13 January 2008, Raleigh, NC - NC State University Centennial Campus And Red Hat HQ
FUDCon stands for Fedora User and Developer Conference. FUDCon Raleigh 2008 will be held as a Bar Camp. A Bar Camp is an "un-conference" where people interested in a wide range of issues come together to teach and learn. Unfamiliar with the un-conference format? Here's the idea in a nutshell. Rather than having scheduled speakers, everyone pitches sessions the morning of the Bar Camp. Those sessions are put on a schedule, and lots of little groups form for intense group learning. Everyone is expected to teach, to talk, to participate. Yeah, it's different from a regular conference - but it works!
Berlind Interivews Google Apps 'founder' Rajen Sheth
read more | digg story
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
What Makes the Patriots Great?
However, my relatives in Worcester (pronounced Wooster), MA are HUGE Pats fans (and Red Sox fans and Bruins fans and...) and so I've been paying some attention lately, especially this season since they went a perfect 16-0.
As it happened, we were in New York this past week visiting my sister and her family for the season-ending NY Giants v. Patriots game in New York. A Pats win would induct them into an elite undefeated club with only 3 other teams.
My sister, brother-in-law and I stayed up to watch the game Saturday night. And it was a great game. Not just because the Patriots won, but also because how they won. The Giants led most of the game, but in the 3rd and 4th Quarters, the Pats staged a beautiful and totally unstoppable comeback, ultimately winning 38-35.
So, what makes the Patriots great? Well, football fans may be inclined to list a fearless and talented QB, awesome receivers, a decent running game and a great coach among the sources of their greatness. While I'd agree that none of this is untrue, I'd add that, in my opinion, none of these assets is the root source of their greatness. Rather, I think the true source of their greatness is the Patriot's Level-5 leadership.
For those of you who haven't read Jim Collins' book Good to Great, you can get a taste of the concept on the author's website. Collins writes:
While it might be a bit of a stretch to compare the good-to-great CEOs to Abraham Lincoln, they did display the same duality.
The Two Sides of Level 5 Leadership
Professional Will | Personal Humility |
Creates superb results, a clear catalyst in the transition from good to great. | Demonstrates a compelling modesty, shunning public adulation; never boastful. |
Demonstrates an unwavering resolve to do whatever must be done to produce the best long-term results, no matter how difficult. | Acts with quiet, calm determination; relies principally on inspired standards, not inspiring charisma, to motivate. |
Sets the standard of building an enduring great company; will settle for nothing less. | Channels ambition into the company, not the self; sets up successors for even greater success in the next generation. |
Looks in the mirror, not out the window, to apportion responsibility for poor results, never blaming other people, external factors, or bad luck. | Looks out the window, not in the mirror, to apportion credit for the success of the company—to other people, external factors, and good luck. |
Here's one example of this from the Giant's game: After the game, a reporter grabbed Patriot's QB Tom Brady before he darted into the locker room for a quick interview. I was struck by the sincere modesty Tom displayed in the interview. When the reporter asked why Tom went back to Moss with a long pass that resulted in a TD right after Moss had dropped a pass in the previous play, Tom instantaneously, and with a surprised tone in his voice, said "He didn't drop that pass. I under threw it." Well, I saw that play, and my take is that both the reporter and Brady were correct. The ball was under thrown, but it bounced right off Moss's hands as if they were made of stone. Point is that Brady could have easily said something like "well, I wanted to give him another chance," or "we all make mistakes," and that wouldn't have been a dig on Moss, it would have been pretty accurate. But he didn't - he was self-effacing, he took responsibility and he went back to Moss on the next play because he was open and because they had connected on similar passes dozens of times during the season. And when asked what he would remember most about the season, it wasn't any personal record, it was the team achievement - all Brady said was "16-0!"
This kind of humility and sincere and complete dedication to team only comes from one place - the top. Brady is a total Level-5 leader on the field because Belichick is a Level-5 leader on the sideline.
What about the IT industry? Who are technology's Level-5's?